Saturday, May 2, 2020

Managing Community Health Assessments-Free-Samples for Students

Question: Discuss about the Community Assessment. Answer: Introduction Community assessment is a tool used by public health departments, social service organization, and hospitals to identify the key health concerns in the community. Community assessment is a logical process which involves the community in the identification and analysis of the health assets and needs, prioritize the concerns, and then implement an appropriate plan to address the health needs identified. In this case, the essay will highlight the steps involved in community assessment. Step 1: Setting up the Assessment Team Setting the assessment team should begin within the organization. In this case, it is imperative to Secure the commitment of individuals in authority as they could impact the peoples feeling, mobilize, support and draw in accomplices, facilitate location and safeguard resources, manage decision making, advocate for the venture's objectives and set policies. Depending on the extent of the appraisal initiative, you might need to enroll support from among the group partners. A small group, which might be a new group or a pre- existing, can settle on some preparatory choices like who to incorporate into the managing as well as advisory boards of trustees. In addition, identify assets require for orientation, create a composed draft of parts and charge of directing/consultative group members, and help set up the initial advisory group (Snyderman, Mills, Hersh Parks, 2014), this is vital in ensuring everything is set for the exercise. Step 2: Securing Resources Perceive in advance that planning consumes resources. In this case, it is important to find cases of what other planning activity may have included and required in financing. You need to answer the essential question: What will it take to help the planning activity? An Assessment Budget Worksheet can enable you to thoroughly consider the procedure. Hence, it is essential to building up a financial plan for supporting the procedure, distinguishing between funds and people. Consider building up a different spending plan for evaluation plan, execution, and assessment. In addition, it is imperative to be practical and not to underestimate the expenses by thoroughly considering the potential costs (Snyderman, Mills, Hersh Parks, 2014). One way to consider the issue of cost/ expenses is by incorporating professional staff. Besides, a grant can be used to take care of part of the expenses, while the rest might be offered as in-kind. Data asked for incorporates yearly compensation, the leve l of time planned for the movement identified with the grant, months planned and the salary asked for. The Assessment Team should designate time for information gathering, survey, examination, composing the plan, presenting, and marketing. Step 3: Drawing in Partners Make progress toward expansive representation. In this case, identify organizations and individuals who look at issues and the probable solutions in a different manner. For instance, search for individuals who have a stake in the community health; partners who can contribute HR, influence the community, and help accomplish goals (Faridi, Franks Simoes, 2017). Also of importance is to find innovative and adaptable approaches to connect with accomplices and members of the community, this can be achieved through rotational meetings and times to accommodate distinctive timetables and allow members to see different groups. In addition, offer meeting alternatives that oblige distinctive preference of solace with the group, for example, casual dialogs, phone calls, supplier discussions, focus groups, autonomous work groups, and break-out groups (Harris, 2016). Step 4: Assembly, Analyzing, And Presenting Data To finish the worksheet, the group must investigate extra quantitative and subjective information to give an entire picture of the community health. For instance, in your region, you may have information from a privately directed survey or program assessment. It is essential to assemble important data from this study. Make sure to include the whole group and chose partners in the information gathering and examination process in order to enhance the credibility of the entire process (Guttmannova Catalano, 2017). Step 5: Setting the needs of the community It is critical to agree on the essential criteria for deciding the health need or central areas. Build up a procedure for prescribing and adopting the final priorities. In this case, set a cutoff date for proposing any progressions to this procedure. Figure out what other existing plans or goals ought to be explicitly considered or joined into this appraisal plan (Schwartz, Lamson Johnson, 2015). In addition, it is important to decide how need ranges should be identified with the concurred vision and extent of the evaluation plan. Therefore, the issues notable in the community health information worksheets should be listed and the criteria chosen kept by the group kept on paper or chart (Chorpita, Daleiden, Krull, 2017). Step 6: Overseeing and managing Community Health Assessments With the Community Health Assessment document finished, the parts of the Community Health Assessment tea change to 'correspondence, health problem progress evaluation and documentation team (Abernethy Schwarz, 2014). Each member must know about his or her duty, as communication would be basic on the implementation of the Community health assessment, and make the process of composing your next comprehensive Community Health Assessment less easy. In this case, you may need to select new or distinctive individuals to the group. Further, as the group screens group purchase- in and the accomplishment of every procedure, the following stage is to decide if alterations are required. The changed methodology could be minor acclimation to the plan, or it could include serious preparing and planning. At whatever point changes or adjustments are made, it would be the obligation of the Assessment Team to communicate to the other members why the change was made and the information behind that chan ge to all the members. In most cases, alteration to the methodology could be minor changes in accordance with the arrangement. Therefore, at whatever point changes or adjustments are made, it would be the duty of the Assessment Tem to communicate them and the information behind those changes to all the other members (Arruda Taylor, 2016). Conclusion The essay has discussed the key steps involved in undertaking a community assessment. The steps involve setting of the assessment team, putting together resources for the exercise, drawing in partners to the plan, data collection, analyzing and presenting, setting of the community needs, and finally overseeing the health issues identified, this steps are imperative in identifying the community needs and the strategies to be used in addressing the needs. References Arruda, Taylor, S. (2016). The Journal Impact Factor and its discontents: steps toward responsible metrics and better research assessment.Open Scholarship Initiative Proceedings,1. Abernethy Schwarz, A. (2014). Two steps forward, two steps back: The role of innovation in transforming towards community-based marine resource management in Solomon Islands.Global Environmental Change,28, 309-321. Chorpita, B. F., Daleiden, Krull, J. L. (2017). Child STEPs in California: A cluster randomized effectiveness trial comparing modular treatment with community implemented treatment for youth with anxiety, depression, conduct problems, or traumatic stress.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology,85(1), 13. Guttmannova Catalano, R. F. (2017). ASSESSMENT OF RISK AND PROTECTION IN COMMUNITY SETUP: STEPS TOWARD CONDUCTING CULTURALLY RELEVANT, SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT.Journal of Community Psychology,45(3), 346-362. Harris, M. J. (2016).Evaluating public and community health programs. John Wiley Sons. 89(7) 67- 89 Faridi, Z., Franks, A., Simoes, E. (2017). Community-based participatory research: necessary next steps.Preventing chronic disease,4(3). Schwartz, Lamson, E., Johnson, D. (2015). Washington Steps Up: A 10-Step Quality Improvement Initiative to Optimize Breastfeeding Support in Community Health Centers.Journal of Human Lactation,31(4), 651-659. Snyderman, Mills, G., Hersh, L., Parks, S. (2014). Strategies to help reduce hospital readmissions: the risk assessment tools, medication reconciliation steps, and discharge script provided here can help you keep your patients from going back into the hospital.Journal of Family Practice,63(8), 430-438.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.